It’s Always About Leadership.

by Aug 21, 20063 comments

Middel Easdt circa CBC 550Following the UN Security Council resolution urging Iran to suspend its uranium enrichment activities within 30 days or else face further action from the international community, Javad Zarif, the Iranian ambassador to the United Nations, said: “Iran is a country that is allergic to pressure and threats and intimidation.” Would we not all say this? Are we not all allergic to threats and intimidation – and fear?

If I told a 12-year-old boy at school who insisted on bringing his switchblade to class every day, that if he didn’t stop doing so I would assassinate his parents, I’d probably get the same reaction as the UN received from Javad Zarif.

The more I observe international leaders and their tribal disputes, the more I believe that the reason we have such a mess in the Middle East today is that we lack vision, awareness and strong leadership. I don’t mean just in the Middle East either. And I see this mess as a metaphor for leadership weakness everywhere – in organizations, corporations, governments and countries.

Before venturing into this tricky subject further, let me just mention my credentials: I have a Master’s in International Relations from USC and my Ph.D. thesis is in International Relations from the London School of Economics, earned during three years of shuttling between Israel and Egypt as I interviewed 40 top opinion formers, intellectuals, terrorists and leaders from the national leaders on down, in each country. I have traveled in the Middle East for half my life and still have many friends there.

The truth is that threats, intimidation and fear have never led to the results humans hope for. Inspiration and love are the only way to lead people to higher ground. You may feel that this is a na√?ve view to hold in the current situation and that there is no room anymore for love or inspiration in such desperate situations. But surely, that’s exactly when love and inspiration are required? When everybody is at their wits end, when everybody is desperate, so desperate in fact, that they have nothing to lose – surely this is the exact moment for compassion, listening, understanding, caring and turning the other cheek (isn’t that what Christians are supposed to do?).

About 20 mile south of the Lebanese border and 15 miles from Haifa lies the modern city of Megiddo at the edge of the Valley of Jezreel. The bible has several references to this place where all of the armies of the world, it says, are to gather for a “final battle” – in the bible this place is called Armageddon.

As a student of leadership, I am frequently reminded that a lack of leadership always results in disappointing outcomes – whether it is in a company, a school, a hospital, a not-for-profit, a government or between countries. In our hearts, we all hope that leaders who can make a difference in one of the most fragile places of conflict on Earth, can see the danger of Armageddon and that we will cool our minds, stay our hands and warm our hearts in order to allow a healing dialogue. Like all dialogues that flow from visionary, conscious leadership it will be a dialogue of listening, and compromise, a dialogue that does not stick to principles or draw lines in the sand, but seeks instead to accommodate and live with opposites, making room for differing views and opinions. It will be a conscious leadership that recognizes that in the beginning we were one and that it is the persistent lack of conscious leadership that has led to the current illusion of separation, a condition which we now need to heal.

It is a paradox that the warring parties in the Middle East share the same roots and history. The peoples of Sumeria and Canaan gave birth to modern civilization and their proto-Aramac language gave rise to Arabic and Hebrew – daughters of the same mother, so to speak. So, in reality, this is a family squabble, and when I was a Doctoral student in the 1980’s, I learned from the deep research I conducted, that the conflict was much more about the latest insult than it was about the principles. If this still holds true (and I believe it does), then wisdom suggests that our first step is to refrain from insulting each other, recognizing that, in reality, we are one, and use this awareness to inspire a new future. In fact, if we could make the most recent gesture one of compassion and listening instead of insult and aggression, we might surprise and encourage a movement towards peace.

Are you watching from the sidelines, or are you urging leaders to be conscious and bring about peace in the world in this way?