Civility

by Jan 4, 20086 comments

My wife and I have been noticing a growing decline in civility – not so much in the big things (although in that too), but in the little things – like opening doors or holding them open for others, giving up seats to seniors, helping people into cars, saying thank you or sorry, inviting others to go first, listening empathetically to the opinions of others, not interrupting, and so on. The little deteriorations in the elegance and grace of personal behavior lead to larger lapses – and ultimately to violence. It’s simply one continuum: at one end we are disrespectful and uncaring to people and the planet and at the other we hold both in deep respect and sacredness.

Voted Canada’s Parliamentarian of the Year, Bill Blaikie says, “Parliament has been ugly before, but people have never been so consistently rude to each other as they are now”. In contrast, in the run-up to the U.S. elections, the two winners of the Iowa Primary, Senator Barak Obama and former governor Mike Huckabee shared a characteristic in their campaign strategy: they intentionally avoided slandering or insulting their opponents.

Rushworth Kidder is one of the leading lights when it comes to thinking about ethics and civility. He leads the Institute for Global Ethics. Recently he wrote about his wish list for the new year – Civility, Vigilance and Fairness. Here is his New Year’s wish for 2008 for Civility:

Civility. This coming year will require a willingness to outgrow the shallow notion of ethics as right-versus-wrong and replace it with a thoughtful clarity about right versus right. During his confirmation hearings, U.S. attorney general Michael Mukasey quoted Supreme Court justice Robert H. Jackson, who wrote that ìthe issue between Ö a right and a wrong Ö never presents a dilemma,î but that ìthe dilemma is because the conflict is between two rights, each in its own way important.î The challenge to ethics in public and corporate life is to replace a rule-bound, compliance-based, right-versus-wrong way of thinking with a values-based, right-versus-right reasoning. Resolution: I wonít resort to a rule when a value will make the point. And I will refuse to reduce the great debates of our day to the polarizing, Iím-right-and-youíre-wrong language of talk radio and blogosphere rant.

What is your experience and hope for the subject of Civility? I welcome your comments.